Image for Scrapping use-by dates would slash food waste – here’s what else could help

Scrapping use-by dates would slash food waste – here’s what else could help

Use-by dates increase the amount of food that gets thrown away, prompting some supermarkets to shelve them. It’s one of a number of simple solutions to food waste

Use-by dates increase the amount of food that gets thrown away, prompting some supermarkets to shelve them. It’s one of a number of simple solutions to food waste

Before ending up on a European supermarket shelf, an avocado has effectively emitted 1.3kg of carbon into the atmosphere. Its production alone consumes 60 gallons of water. Despite this, the fruit will often be discarded as household waste.

Wastage occurs at each stage of the food supply chain, but household food waste is one of the most significant. British households waste an estimated 6.7m tonnes of food each year, amounting to approximately 32 per cent of all purchased food items.

Household food waste is also notoriously difficult to manage. Studies show that people often both fail to understand the environmental consequences of food waste, and are rarely held accountable for it.

Much of this wastage is avoidable and the food may have been eaten had it been better managed. This has prompted Waitrose to join a growing number of food retailers in removing date labelling, such as the ‘use-by’ or ‘best-before’ date, from some fresh food items in an attempt to reduce household food waste.

Past studies have confirmed the importance of date labelling on consumers’ decision making. Almost 60 per cent of Western European people surveyed said they ‘always’ check date labels while purchasing a food item or preparing a meal.

But the routine application of date labelling has long come under criticism. A recent study attributed people’s failure to understand the application of date labelling to an increased likelihood of irrational decision making. Indeed, research has shown that consumers commonly reject edible, but date-expired food, rejecting up to 56.7 per cent of such food on average.

Solutions to food waste

People often slavishly stick to use-by dates, throwing good food away in the process. Image: Jason Briscoe

The Institute of Food Technologists additionally question whether date labels are an accurate measure of food safety anyway, as post-packaging temperature control cannot be assured.

The removal of date labelling is therefore a promising start. Without date labels, often dubious information that may interfere with people’s perception of what is edible, is removed. Instead, they are encouraged to sense-check fresh food items.

In the case of an avocado, the advice given to consumers is that when ripe, it should have a “pleasant and slightly sweet aroma”, whilst the skin should be “dark green or brown”. Information is also provided on how an avocado should look, taste, and feel when ‘overripe’. It is hoped that better informed people will be less likely to blindly discard food due to a lapsed date.

The Waste and Resources Action Programme (WRAP) predict that approximately 50,000 tonnes of food waste could be avoided each year in the UK if date labels were removed from just apples, bananas, potatoes, cucumber and broccoli.

Should retailers be doing more?

Despite growing momentum in date label removal, industry stakeholders remain insistent that retailers are duty-bound to do more.

Some research suggests that retailers should also explore alternative ways of expressing labelling to better meet consumers’ informational needs. Re-scripted date labels such as ‘best before, often good after’ may encourage the acceptance of ‘date-expired’ foods in the knowledge that the item remains safe to consume.

Encouraging people to buy appropriate amounts of food items is also an effective way of reducing food waste. Supermarkets are being placed under increasing pressure to sell loose products. WRAP forecast considerable waste reductions should this be implemented nationwide.

Helping people better connect with growing can also help reduce food waste. Image: Markus Spiske

Other solutions to food waste

Gradually changing ingrained behaviour, through long-term awareness campaigns is often considered key to reducing food waste. Commercial campaigns and targeted community outreach programmes can contribute to a greater understanding of the science behind date labels. They can also encourage people to source food locally and participate in urban farming schemes.

A pilot study at the University of Sussex analysed fruit and vegetable yields from 34 urban allotments. They found that urban growers were able to grow 1kg of fruit and vegetables per sq metre, a yield within the range of a conventional farm.

50,000 tonnes of food waste could be avoided each year in the UK if date labels were removed from just five items

Changing people’s perceptions through innovative social and commercial initiatives, also represent increasingly popular solutions to food waste. Downloadable meal planning and smart shopping tips both encourage responsible shopping practices.

Fresh food box schemes which supply precise quantities of ingredients for specific dishes also substantially reduces household food waste. The Wuppertal Institute reports that HelloFresh meals generate 51 per cent less food waste than non-HelloFresh meals.

While the removal of date labels indicates a growing desire to reduce food waste, it is effective only if consumers are supported with better information and encouraged to simultaneously adopt more sustainable shopping practices. While changing dietary culture and consumer behaviours towards greater sustainability is an arduous process, it is a necessary one as we transition towards greater responsibility in food waste management.

Lingxuan Liu is a lecturer in sustainability at Lancaster University, England.

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Main image: Ridofranz/iStock

The Conversation

Help us continue to break the bad news bias

Positive News is helping more people than ever to get a balanced view of the world – one that supports their wellbeing and empowers them to make a difference towards a better future. And as our audience and impact grows, we’re showing the rest of the media that good news matters.

But the UK’s cost of living crisis is affecting our income, with fewer people able to commit to a magazine subscription – which has traditionally been our main source of funding. Plus, paper and printing costs keep rising.

We don’t want to put a paywall on our website, because we believe everyone should have the chance to benefit from good news. But we won’t be able to continue funding our online reporting without your help.

If you value what we do and can afford to, please consider making a one-off or regular contribution as a Positive News supporter. We need 1,000 readers to contribute just £3 per month to get us through this challenging time.

And remember, as a not-for-profit, we work only in service to you, and all funds go towards our journalism.


Related articles